The market for short-term credit is changing as a result of regulatory changes; target market regulations are imposing more stringent criteria on payday loans in terms of product matching.
According to research published in March 2025 by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, short-term lenders frequently fail to match goods to customer needs.
Due to the substantial gaps in target market determinations found by the regulator’s examination, ASIC’s warning that inadequate product design and distribution methods expose vulnerable borrowers to inappropriate credit was reinforced.
The enforcement focus centers on Target Market Determinations (TMDs). These regulatory documents ensure financial products reach suitable consumers. When lenders skip proper implementation, vulnerable Australians risk falling into unsuitable credit arrangements.
The issue touches 1.77 million Australian households who have used these short-term credit products recently. The $1.3 billion sector now faces unprecedented scrutiny as regulators work to protect consumers from harmful lending practices.
How Are Payday Loans Target Market Rules Improving Product Matching for Borrowers?
Understanding Target Market Determinations
Target Market Determinations form part of Australia’s Design and Distribution Obligations framework. This system became mandatory in October 2021. Under these regulations, every credit provider must create detailed documentation describing their intended consumer segment.
The requirements go beyond basic eligibility criteria. Lenders must specify consumer financial situations that align with product features. They must establish review periods between six and twelve months.
Providers must also report instances where products reach consumers outside defined target markets within ten business days.
These rules exist because consumers accessing small amount credit contracts are often financially vulnerable and need additional regulatory safeguards.
Critical Compliance Failures Identified

ASIC’s Report 805 reveals three significant systemic issues across the payday loans sector.
First, many providers use generic legislative definitions rather than specific consumer profiles when defining target markets. This approach provides insufficient guidance and fails to meet regulatory expectations.
Second, review triggers lack precision. Many lenders establish thresholds so broad that Target Market Determinations rarely undergo updates. Unsuitable lending practices go unnoticed in the absence of effective review procedures.
Third, data points to the need for strategic product repositioning to get around more stringent laws. Significant changes are seen in data gathered between December 2022 and August 2024.
The market share of small loan contracts (less than $2,000) fell from 80% to less than 60%. During the same time period, medium-sized credit contracts ($2,000 to $5,000) grew proportionately.
This change is significant because the National Consumer Credit Protection Act imposes stricter consumer protections on small amount credit contracts.
ASIC has shown that it is willing to enforce the law through a number of initiatives. For many violations of the National Credit Act, Ferratum Australia was hit with penalties totaling $16 million by the regulator. Procedures in federal court against other providers indicate ongoing regulatory monitoring.
Regulatory Framework for Improved Consumer Protections
Stricter Target Market Determination regulations provide Australian borrowers facing financial difficulties with a number of protections.
Currently, before granting applications, lenders must perform comprehensive evaluations to confirm income and current debt commitments. Documentation standards make ensuring suppliers can show why particular items are appropriate for certain situations.
The framework includes presumptions against unsuitable lending. Loans are presumed unsuitable when borrowers have accessed two or more payday loans within the preceding 90 days. This mechanism addresses debt spiral risks identified in consumer advocacy research.
Income-based repayment caps represent another critical protection. Loan repayments are limited by regulations to no more than 10% of the borrower’s net income during the repayment period. By doing this, debtors are guaranteed to keep enough money for necessities.
Provisions for early repayment stop excessive charge billing. Lenders are not allowed to charge monthly fees for unused months when borrowers return loans prior to the scheduled term completion.
Financial education platforms like MeLoan provide resources helping consumers understand regulatory protections. These platforms offer detailed explanations of how Australian law protects instant loan online borrowers through frameworks like Target Market Determinations.
Buy Now Pay Later Regulatory Convergence
June 2025 marked substantial regulatory change as Buy Now Pay Later providers entered the same licensing framework governing traditional lenders. This development affects an estimated 62 percent of Australian consumers using BNPL products.
Previously operating outside credit legislation, BNPL providers including major market participants now require Australian Credit Licences. They must comply with responsible lending obligations and implement Target Market Determinations under identical standards.
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Act 2024 introduced “low cost credit contracts” as a distinct regulatory category. Most BNPL products qualify for this classification.
Regulatory convergence creates consistency across short-term credit products. Whether consumers consider traditional small amount credit contracts or BNPL options, providers must demonstrate product suitability through documented assessment processes.
Warning Signs of Inadequate Assessment

Knowing their rights under Target Market Determination frameworks enables customers to spot inappropriate loan activities and make wise choices.
Red Flags to Watch For:
- Minimal verification of income or existing obligations
- Pressure to accept loan amounts exceeding requested sums
- Credit offers arriving despite multiple existing short-term loans
- Insufficient explanation of total costs and fee structures
Requests for copies of lender Target Market Determinations and clarification on suitability assessments should be made by customers.
Lenders are required to provide an explanation of their methodology and show how their products correspond with verified consumer situations.
Regulated Alternatives to High-Cost Credit
Prior to obtaining payday loans, customers ought to assess less expensive options that are equally accessible.
The No Interest Loan Program (NILS)
offers free loans up to $3,000 with no fees or interest. Those who make less than $70,000 a year as single people or $100,000 with dependents are eligible. At 13 64 57, Good Shepherd is in charge of organising the nationwide network.
Centrelink Advance Payments
Available to most benefit recipients through Service Australia’s online portal. Advances carry no interest or establishment fees. Repayments are deducted from future benefit payments.
Utility Hardship Programs
Energy and water providers maintain legal obligations to offer payment arrangements during financial difficulty. Many companies provide rebates and extended payment terms for eligible consumers.
Financial Counselling Services
Weekdays from 9.30 am to 4.30 pm, the National Debt Helpline (1800 007 007) is open. Mob Strong Debt Help’s 1800 808 488 number is open to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples at the same hours.
Market Prospects and Industry Evolution
Due to rising compliance costs and heightened regulatory scrutiny, the payday lending market is undergoing substantial reorganisation. According to industry study, there may be market consolidation. Complicated licensing and monitoring requirements may cause smaller providers to leave.
This trend is consistent with earlier consequences of regulatory tightening. Standardised frameworks, on the other hand, might help digital firms and conventional financial institutions join markets with more defined regulatory boundaries.
According to market research, the payday loan industry in Australia is expected to grow to $341.6 million by 2030. Comparing this to 2022 levels, the compound annual growth rate is 4.9%. Growth paths are significantly influenced by how well regulations balance product availability and customer protection.
ASIC keeps a close eye on adherence to responsible lending requirements and Target Market Determinations. Businesses that might be evading consumer regulations are still being looked into by the regulator.
Important Steps for Customers

Understanding their rights under the current regulatory frameworks should be a top priority for Australian borrowers navigating short-term borrowing options.
Key Steps:
- Request and review lender Target Market Determinations
- Verify lenders hold current Australian Credit Licences
- Confirm assessment methodologies before accepting products
- Explore regulated alternatives including NILS and Centrelink advances
- Access free financial counselling when facing payment difficulties
Quick Reference Resources:
- National Debt Helpline: 1800 007 007
- ASIC MoneySmart: moneysmart.gov.au
- Good Shepherd NILS: 13 64 57
- Service Australia: servicesaustralia.gov.au
In Australia’s credit industry, stronger target market determinations improve consumer protections.
When paired with access to regulated alternatives and well-informed decision-making, these frameworks help Australians deal with financial difficulties.
Despite ongoing regulatory action and changes in business norms, consumer knowledge continues to be the most effective defense against inappropriate lending.
Future Regulatory Considerations
Target Market Determinations represent substantial progress in consumer credit oversight. They compel lenders to document product-consumer matching rationale. However, regulatory frameworks face ongoing challenges.
Academic research highlights persistent difficulties. Vulnerable consumers require credit access during financial hardship. Yet high-cost products risk exacerbating difficulties. Overly restrictive access may push consumers toward less regulated alternatives including pawnbroking.
The effectiveness of TMD frameworks ultimately depends on rigorous implementation and consistent enforcement. Recent actions signal regulatory commitment. Sustained monitoring remains essential.
Financial comparison and education platforms including MeLoan play complementary roles. They help consumers understand regulatory protections and evaluate products against individual circumstances before committing to credit agreements.
Author Profile

- Blogger by Passion | Contributor to many Business Blogs in the United Kingdom | Fascinated to Write Blogs in Business & Startup Niches |
Latest entries
FinanceFebruary 26, 2026Centrepay End Dates Make Repayments More Predictable for Centrelink Borrowers
FinanceFebruary 26, 2026Payday Loans Get Better Product Matching Under Target Market Rules
CareerFebruary 26, 2026Is Graphic Design a Good Career for the Future?
FinanceFebruary 7, 2026The Main Types of Online Fundraising Used by Charities




